ABOUT ISCD
MEMBERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
CERTIFICATION
INTERNATIONAL
EDUCATION
MEETINGS & EVENTS
PUBLICATIONS & PRODUCTS
ADVOCACY
OFFICIAL POSITIONS
FACILITY ACCREDITATION
PATIENT INFORMATION
RESOURCES
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
 
Members Only Login

Public Policy Issues


Osteoporosis Care at Risk in the United States

October 14, 2008 - The following article link has been made available to us by Osteoporosis International for a three-month period. The article is published in Osteoporosis Interational, Osteoporos Int (2008) 19:1505–1509.

 

 


ISCD Objects to Proposed Medicare Rule

On August 27, 2008 the ISCD filed comments on the latest Medicare proposed rule, CMS-1403-P. The rule included several provisions that threaten our ability to care for osteoporosis patients.  In addition to the administrative burden on physicians, the adoption of this proposed rule represents another assault on the availability of quality DXA.

The ISCD argued against the adoption of a new rule that would require physicians performing diagnostic imaging in their offices to enroll as an independent diagnostic testing facility (IDTF) and comply with certain standards in order to be eligible for reimbursement. The proposed rule in part focused on the qualifications for both physician and non-physician personnel performing these imaging procedures. CMS indicated that the impetus for this proposal was the result of comments by personnel at IDTFs who bristled under new requirements that only applied to imaging procedures performed in their facilities. They argued that regulations applying to imaging procedures should apply across the board regardless of where the location of physician performing it.

When implementing the rule on IDTFs, a majority of Medicare carriers require the supervising physician for DXA scans be limited to radiologists and/or internists. In addition, a majority of these carriers have not recognized the ISCD Certification of technologists.  We argued that the rule would exclude a substantial and highly skilled portion of the provider community.

ISCD also opposed the inadequate reimbursement rate for DXA and urged CMS to reevaluate the reimbursement for DXA to more accurately reflect the cost of providing the service.  Click here to read the full text of the ISCD’s comments to CMS-1403-P.


CMS Proposes New Rules Regarding Imaging Services in Physicians’ Offices.  Impact on DXA Testing is Unclear. 

On June 30, 2008 CMS proposed new rules that may have far-reaching implications for physicians providing diagnostic imaging services, including central DXA, to Medicare beneficiaries in their offices. CMS-1403-P would require physicians providing these services in a non-facility setting to comply with regulations that already apply to Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs).1

The CMS proposed rule would require physicians performing diagnostic imaging services in their offices to:

  1. Enroll as an IDTF;
  2. Undergo inspection by the Medicare carrier;
  3. Ensure the licensure and/or certification of non-physician personnel such as technologists; and
  4. Have a supervising physician who must be proficient in the performance and interpretation of each type of diagnostic procedure. The proficiency may be documented by certification in a specific medical specialty or subspecialties or by criteria established by the Medicare carrier.

It is unclear how this proposal would be interpreted by local Medicare carriers and how it would affect physicians and technologists providing DXA testing. Carriers have interpreted the IDTF regulations in a very restrictive manner by requiring that most imaging procedures be supervised by a radiologist. The proposed rule would also impose minimum standards on technologists if the imaging procedure is performed in a state that does not regulate radiologic technologists.

CMS has requested comments and feedback regarding this proposed rule.   The rule specifically requests comments by individuals and groups to respond to the following questions:

 
  1. Should the new requirements only apply to advanced imaging services such as PET, CT and MRI, and exclude X-ray, DXA, ultrasound and fluoroscopy?
  2. Should the new requirements apply only to imaging services or to other diagnostic testing services such as electrocardiograms?
  3. What should the appropriate criteria be for application of the new requirements?

These questions make it clear that the parameters of the proposed rule have not yet been finalized. ISCD will submit comments to CMS on the proposed rule by the August 28 deadline and will keep you posted regarding its status.  As soon as ISCD has thoroughly analyzed the CMS proposal and developed our response, we will call upon our members to submit comments to CMS by the August 28 deadline. If you have questions or want to provide feedback on this issue, please contact ISCD Legislative Counsel, Donna Fiorentino.

Click here to view a relevant excerpt of CMS 1403-P.
Click here for the portion of the CMS regulations regarding IDTFs that would apply to diagnostic testing performed in physicians' offices.

1
IDTFs by definition provide diagnostic testing in a location other than a hospital or physician’s office, cannot bill for therapeutic or interventional radiology procedures and must provide at least one general supervision physician, who is on the premises and immediately available and is responsible for overall direction and quality control of the testing.

 


DXA Cuts Not Addressed in Medicare Package

On July 15, Congress voted to override President Bush’s veto of the long-awaited physician fix—the legislation that will ward off the 10.6% across the board cuts for physician services under the Medicare program. The bill will result in a physician payment update of 0.5% through December 31, 2008 and 1.1% increase for the 2009 calendar year.

The recurring Medicare physician fee crisis is the result of a cost control formula that was put into place in 1997. While there was agreement among Congressional leaders that the scheduled fee cuts needed to be reversed, battle lines were drawn between Congressional Democrats and Republicans as to how to pay for this moratorium; Democrats favored drawing money from the Medicare Advantage Plans as a way to fund the moratorium while Republicans were opposed to using this as a funding source. In the end, enough Republicans split with their leadership to pass the legislation.

While Congress addressed the Medicare cuts, a remedy for the DXA cuts was not included in this larger Medicare package. If left uncorrected, central DXA reimbursement in the non-facility setting will drop to approximately $76 in 2009 and $56 in 2010.

Because of the efforts of the ISCD and our partners, bills to address reimbursement cuts to DXA were introduced in both the House and the Senate with bi-partisan support. By targeting members of Congress on key committees through direct visits to Washington as well as intensive letter writing, e-mail and phone campaign, we now have raised awareness of the critical nature of this issue. While we have made substantial progress to address the DXA issue, more work needs to be done.

ISCD will continue to work with our partners this year to identify other legislative options so that DXA services are reimbursed appropriately and patient access to care is not threatened. Additionally, we are developing strategies to address this issue with the new Administration and Congress in 2009. 

 


The DXA Bill is Here - Act Now

On March 4, 2008, U.S. Senators Ken Salazar (D-CO) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) filed a bill to remedy the Medicare cuts to DXA.  S. 2702, the "Medicare Fracture Prevention and Osteoporosis Testing Act", is the Senate companion to H.R. 4206,  the bill introduced in the House by Representative Shelley Berkley (D-NV) last fall. Introduction of the DXA bill in the Senate marks an important step in our battle to restore DXA reimbursement to appropriate levels.  Senators Salazar and Snowe need the support of their Senate colleagues to give the bill necessary momentum and to show Senate leadership that osteoporosis testing is an issue that requires their immediate attention.  Visit our Advocacy Web site to easily send letters to your Senators asking for support of this bill. Click on Bill Cosponsors below to see if your Senator is one of the 9 members of Congress that has signed on as a bill sponsor.   If they aren't listed, contact your Senator and urge them to sign on as a cosponsor to this important piece of legislation.

On November 15, 2007, Representative Shelley Berkley (D-NV) introduced H.R. 4206, the "Medicare Fracture Prevention and Osteoporosis Testing Act of 2007."  The bill will freeze DXA rates at 2006 levels until a study of the effect of these cuts on patient care is completed.  At this time, Rep. Berkley needs the support of her Congressional colleagues to give this bill added momentum. Click on Bill Cosponsors below to see if your Congressional Representative is one of the 67 members of Congress that has signed on as a bill sponsor.   If they aren't listed, contact your Congressional Representative and urge them to sign on as a cosponsor to this important piece of legislation.  Links to a DXA Fact Sheet and Talking Points for your calls are posted below.   



A PowerPoint Overview - DXA Cuts

Click the link below to view or download a PowerPoint Overview of the DXA Cuts.  This document illustrates the problems created by the DXA cuts and the need to restore reimbursement to appropriate levels.  It can be used with local organizations and groups to generate participation in our grassroots advocacy campaign.

 


We Need Your Stories

As Congress returns from the holiday recess, ISCD and members of the DXA task force are continuing to press for a remedy to the DXA cuts. On February 25 and 26, ISCD will join AACE in Washington to visit key members of Congress to urge passage of Representative Berkley’s bill, H.R. 4206, the Medicare Fracture Prevention and Osteoporosis Testing Act of 2007 in the House and a companion bill in the Senate.

In the past year, ISCD and our partners have developed critical survey and statistical data to support our legislative position. While this information is imperative, we find that members of Congress are anxious to know how the cuts are affecting their constituents. You can help. We are collecting stories about practices who have already stopped DXA testing or have cut back services as the result of the Medicare cuts. An example of one such story from one of our Michigan members is listed below. If you have a story to tell, please contact Donna Fiorentino at dfiorentino@iscd.org.  

David Nadolski, MD

Midland, MI

 
 

I had a DXA machine in my office and noticed the trend that my older patients did not drive the 40-60 miles to see me for their scans in the winter. I bought an RV and retrofitted it, making it handicapped accessible. I took it on the road all over rural Michigan, visiting some 150 docs in 60 sites including an American Indian reservation and a former TB Sanatorium that is now a 400 bed facility for mentally disabled people. Interestingly, because of the requirement for seizure medication for these patients and some of the birth defects, this population is disproportionately affected by osteoporosis. I was the only provider visiting these patients and providing the care they needed. I added another van and had 4 teams visiting patients throughout Michigan. At the high point, I was doing some 3800 scans a year. With gas prices on the rise (my RVs got just 7 miles to the gallon) combined with drastic Medicare cuts, in June of 2007 I was forced to stop my mobile operation. I am still providing DXA scans within my office, but now provide only 400 scans per year. I do not believe the patients I once saw in the rural areas of Michigan are now being served.

 

Visit the ISCD Advocacy Web site now, login (or register) and “Take Action” as an easy way to contact your Congressional Representative online.  It only takes a few minutes to help.

Go to the ISCD Advocacy Web site     See your stories by state



DXA Study Findings from The Lewin Group

ISCD, along with our sister societies, recently commissioned a study by The Lewin Group to determine the cost of performing a DXA and VFA procedure in the physician office setting. The study also looked at program costs associated with reversing Medicare payment cuts for these procedures. The Lewin Group study concluded that after accounting for savings assoicated with avoided fractures and the cost of treating at-risk individuals, restoring DXA payment rates to the 2006 level will ACTUALLY save the Medicare program $1.14 billion over five years.

Click here to read the executive summary or the complete report.  If you have questions, please contact Donna Fiorentino, Manager of Public Policy Affairs at dfiorentino@iscd.org


Related Articles

Below is a link to a compilation of articles related to Public Policy issues/efforts.


Visit Media Central

Return to the Advocacy Home Page

 

 

 

 
2009 Annual Meeting
2009 Annual Meeting
JOIN ISCD
Renew Your Membership
Public Policy Issues
Official Positions Slideshow
Remote Testing
2008 Annual Meeting Presentations
Frequently Asked Questions
Post a Job
CME/CE Links
Education Evaluator
ISCD Travel Center
Member ID Lookup
ISCD and Other 'Bone' Related Products
 
 

Page Last Updated: 10/14/2008

HOME ... SITE MAP ... DISCLAIMER ... CONTACT ISCD
©2008 International Society for Clinical Densitometry, Inc.